MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164363991 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1999.804611

Analytical solution and scaled model of a unipolar HVDC transmission line

2003· article· en· W2164363991 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Li, M.R. Raghuveer, I.R. Ciric

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Hydro
KeywordsCorona (planetary geology)ConductorElectric power transmissionTransmission lineCorona ringRADIUSPhysicsElectrical conductorLine (geometry)VoltageComputational physicsMechanicsElectrical engineeringCorona dischargeEngineeringMathematicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing analytical solutions for the ionized field of a unipolar HVDC transmission line are reviewed. The analytical relations indicate that the corona current is directly proportional to the square of the corona onset field strength if the ratio of the applied voltage to the corona onset value and that of the conductor height to its radius remain fixed. This is confirmed by numerical results. It is pointed out that this observation makes it possible to derive the basis of a scaled model to evaluate the corona current and hence the resulting power loss of a full-scale unipolar DC line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207