MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164402548 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.4752688

IEEE 802.22: The first cognitive radio wireless regional area network standard

2009· article· en· W2164402548 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Stevenson, Gérald Chouinard, Zhongding Lei, Wendong Hu, Stephen J. Shellhammer, Winston Caldwell

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIEEE 802.11uIEEE 802.11w-2009Computer networkCognitive radioIEEE 802Inter-Access Point ProtocolIEEE 802.11e-2005IEEE 802.11sWireless lanIEEE 802.1XTelecommunicationsIEEE 802.11b-1999Wireless networkIEEE 802.11r-2008Service setCognitive networkIEEE 802.11Wi-FiWirelessWi-Fi arrayWireless mesh network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a high-level overview of the IEEE 802.22 standard for cognitive wireless regional area networks (WRANs) that is under development in the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,031
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207