MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164411333 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2007.41

On Jamming Capacity of General Multiuser CDMA Systems

2007· article· en· W2164411333 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Nikjah, Norman C. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingTelecommunications linkJammingChannel state informationComputer scienceNakagami distributionChannel capacityBandwidth (computing)Computer networkNear-far problemCode division multiple accessSpread spectrumChannel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringWirelessPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capacity of a general multiuser CDMA jamming channel is analyzed when the receiver has or lacks jammer state information. Analyses are carried out for noncooperative and cooperative users in uplink and downlink static and Nakagami fading channels. The results are applied to a versatile multiple access channel model introduced in Nikjah and Beaulieu (2006). The model is based on the time-bandwidth dimensionality and is considered for the user capacity analysis of a variety of multiuser spread spectrum systems contaminated by jamming. It is found that the jammer should spread its energy evenly over all degrees of freedom in order to minimize the average capacity. Also, the capacity behavior appears to be dominated more by knowledge of jammer state information than by the effects of fading. The capacity of downlink channels in cooperative schemes is found to be more sensitive to changes in fading severity, compared with the capacity of other kinds of channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207