A new taxonomic interpretation of the type of<i>Plocamium cartilagineum</i>(Plocamiales, Florideophyceae) and its consequences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A detailed study of the type specimen of Plocamium cartilagineum and other original material of European species of Plocamium revealed that the nomenclatural reorganization proposed by Saunders & Lehmkuhl in 2005 must be revised. The main consequences of the new interpretation are: (1) the use of Plocamium lyngbyanum to name their molecular entity EUR1 (previously considered to be equivalent to P. cartilagineum s.s.); and (2) adopting P. cartilagineum for their molecular entity EUR2, which renders P. subtile Kützing a taxonomic synonym. Using a combination of morphological, anatomical and molecular information (barcoding), we conclude that the colour and consistency of the thallus, the number of ramuli per series, the morphology and arrangement of the tetrasporangial stichidia, the length of the tetrasporangia, and the type of habitat are the most reliable characters of classical taxonomy for discriminating between the species of Plocamium occurring in northern Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it