MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164494091 · doi:10.4141/cjss09014

Effects of limestone applications on soil pH and extractable elements in a cauliflower field study

2010· article· en· W2164494091 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. G. Kowalenko, Milan Ihnat

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySoil testSoil pHSoil waterEnvironmental chemistryField experimentMineralogyAnimal scienceAgronomySoil scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pH and Mehlich-3 extractable concentrations of a variety of elements including those that were study treatments (Ca, Mn and Zn) and those that were expected to be influenced by the treatments (Mg, Sr, K, Rb, Na, Al, Fe, Si and Cu) were determined in soil samples from a cauliflower field trial conducted between 1979 and 1985. The treatments were limestone applied to the soil at three rates (0, 9 and 19 Mg ha -1 ) and Zn and Mn foliar applications. The pH of air-dried samples varied only slightly when analysed within each year of sampling versus as one batch after the trial was completed, which showed that the samples were stable over the long time the samples had to be stored through the field trial period and until the samples were analysed. Being able to do all the analyses in one batch also facilitated the application of quality control to ensure comparability of results. There were differences in the soil measurements of most of the elements taken pre-plant versus post-harvest, showing that the time of sampling must be consistent for experimental and soil test interpretations. Post-harvest samples (i.e., focusing on residual effects of limestone application) were selected to examine the treatment effects. Limestone application had wide-ranging and variable effects on extractable elements in the soil. Soil pH and extractable Ca increased with increased limestone rate as expected, while the amount of extractable Mn, Zn, K, Mg, Na, Al and Fe decreased. Extractable Sr, Si and Cu increased with limestone applications. Extractable Ca, Zn, Mg, Al and Si were affected to 15-30 cm depth, and pH and extractable Mn, Rb and Fe were affected to 30-60 cm. Subsurface (>15 cm depth) Sr, K, Na and Cu were not influenced by the limestone treatments. The effect of limestone on the elements tended to correspond to the effect previously observed on the contents of these elements in cauliflower plants. The ability of Mehlich-3 extract solution to reflect the availability of elements to plants and the effect of limestone applications on other elements simultaneously showed the potential for this soil test solution to predict the need for nutrient amendments to prevent lime-induced deficiencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207