MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Plant and soil responses to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of bromegrass‐dominated haylands in Saskatchewan, Canada

2011· article· en· W2164572599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGrass and Forage Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilizerHuman fertilizationAnimal scienceDry matterPhosphorusNitrogenForageBromusAgronomyYield (engineering)Nitrogen fertilizerChemistryBiologyPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Field experiments were conducted at three different sites in Saskatchewan, Canada (Colonsay, Vanscoy and Rosthern) over two years (2005 and 2006) to determine the effects of dribble‐banded and coulter‐injected liquid fertilizer applied in the spring of 2005 at 56, 112 and 224 kg N ha −1 with and without P at 28 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 . The three sites were unfertilized, 7‐ to 8‐year old stands of mainly meadow bromegrass ( Bromus riparius )‐dominated haylands. All fertilization treatments produced significantly ( P ≤ 0·05) higher dry matter yield than the control in the year of application at the three Saskatchewan sites. There was no significant difference between the two application methods (surface dribble band vs. coulter injected) for any fertilizer treatments. The addition of 28 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 P fertilizer along with the N fertilizer did not have a significant effect on yield in most cases. In the year of application, increasing N rates above 56 kg N ha −1 did not significantly increase yield over the 56 kg N ha −1 rate in most cases, but did increase N concentration, N uptake and protein concentration. A significant residual effect was found in the high N‐rate treatments in 2006, with significantly higher yield and N uptake. In 2005, the forage N and P uptake in the fertilized treatments were significantly higher than the control in all cases. The N uptake at the three Saskatchewan sites increased with increasing N rate up to the high rate of 224 kg N ha −1 , although the percent recovery of applied N decreased with increasing rate. The P fertilization with 28 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 also increased P uptake. Overall, rates of fertilizer of approximately 56 kg N ha −1 appear to be sufficient to produce nearly maximum forage yield and protein concentration of the grass in the year of application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it