MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164574966 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1577849

Exact evaluation of BER for arbitrary modulation and signaling in AWGN channel

2005· article· en· W2164574966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModulation (music)Computer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseSymbol (formal)Bounding overwatchTransmission (telecommunications)ConstellationChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmBit error rateQuadrature amplitude modulationTheoretical computer scienceElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exact evaluation of the bit- and symbol error rates in two dimensional constellation is a fundamental problem of digital communications which has closed-form solutions for particular modulations and/or bits-to-symbol mapping. In this paper we propose a general method which yields the exact results for arbitrary modulation constellation, arbitrary bits-to-symbol mapping and deals with the case of non-uniform signalling. These three conditions define any digital transmission using memoryless modulation thus, our method is a general tool solving all problems tackled in the literature under constraints imposed on one or more of the parameters defining the modulation or signalling type. Such evaluation tool is of practical importance during the design of the modulation. Through numerical simulations we illustrate the advantages offered by the new method when compared to the bounding technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it