MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164596084 · doi:10.1109/tce.2007.4429244

A Fast Directional Sigma Filter for Noise Reduction in Digital TV Signals

2007· article· en· W2164596084 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Ghazal, Aishy Amer, Ali Ghrayeb

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalt-and-pepper noiseNoise reductionComputer scienceAdaptive filterGaussian noiseFilter (signal processing)MathematicsFilter designRoot-raised-cosine filterKernel adaptive filterAlgorithmMedian filterComputer visionImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a structure-oriented multidirectional Sigma filter for additive white Gaussian noise in digital TV signals. Filtering is restricted to homogeneous directions to reduce blurring by analyzing local structure using directional second derivatives. The proposed filter improves the Sigma estimate of denoised pixels by imposing a homogeneity constraint on the noise-adaptive selection of estimation pixels by the Sigma filter. It achieves noise-reduction gains of up to 4.8 dB Peak-Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) in real-time. The block size, shape and coefficients of the filter are adapted to both structure and noise level. The goal is to optimize the filter with regard to noise-reduction gain and structure preservation. A possible hardware-oriented design of the proposed filter is also presented. To show the effectiveness of the proposed method, comparisons between the proposed Sigma filter and referenced Sigma filters in terms of the PSNR gain and the modulation transfer function (MTF) are shown. Results show that the proposed method achieves a higher PSNR gain and contrast transfer ratio than referenced Sigma filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207