Improvement in open-angle glaucoma by nocturnal home haemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine Hospital,Antalya, Turkey and 2Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital – University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is a common ocular abnormality seen in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [ 1 ]. Although the pathogenesis of OAG is not yet fully understood, lowering intraocular pressure is the accepted treatment goal. Without adequate treatment, glaucoma can lead to visual disability and eventual blindness [ 2 ]. From a simplified viewpoint, intraocular pressure is determined by the balance between aqueous production from the ciliary body and drainage of the aqueous humour through the trabecular meshwork. Normal intraocular pressure (IOP) ranges from 10 to 21 mmHg. IOP of 20–30 mmHg usually results in chronic optic nerve damage. In cases of significant intraocular hypertension (40–50 mmHg), rapid visual loss and retinovascular occlusion may occur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".