Les orientations de recherche d'aide chez les aînés regroupés1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les orientations de recherche d'aide ont été vues au cours d'une étude menée auprès de 360 aînés. Une liste de 15 problèmes pouvant affecter les gens âgés a été proposée aux répondants à qui l’on a demandé de nommer la ressource la plus adéquate. Les orientations de recherche d'aide les plus souvent mentionnées sont l'orientation vers Soi-même , puis vers les Proches et vers les Services . Les corrélations simples entre les orientations montrent qu'elles sont distinctes sans être exclusives. Les gens privilégient un type de ressources, mais peuvent en solliciter d'autres. Les orientations de recherche d'aide ne sont donc pas tant déterminantes de la fréquence de l'utilisation des services que de la manière dont les usagers les abordent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".