MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164648624 · doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0265

Metabolic and Behavioral Characteristics of Metabolically Obese but Normal-Weight Women

2004· article· en· W2164648624 on OpenAlexaff
Florence Conus, David B. Allison, Rémi Rabasa‐Lhoret, Maxime St-Onge, David H. St‐Pierre, Andréanne Tremblay-Lebeau, Éric T. Poehlman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineAdiponectinMedicineLeptinBody mass indexGhrelinObesityBasal metabolic rateMetabolic syndromeBlood pressureInsulin resistanceHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A unique subset of individuals termed metabolically obese but normal weight (MONW) has been identified. These young women are potentially at increased risk for development of the metabolic syndrome despite their young age and normal body mass index. We seek to determine metabolic and behavioral factors that could potentially distinguish MONW women from young women with a normal metabolic profile.Ninety-six women were classified as MONW (n = 12) or non-MONW (n = 84) based on a cut point of insulin sensitivity (as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment). Potentially distinguishing phenotypes between groups measured included serum lipids, ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, body composition and body fat distribution, resting and physical activity energy expenditure, peak oxygen uptake, dietary intake, dietary behavior, and family history and lifestyle variables. Despite a similar body mass index between groups, MONW women showed higher percent body fat, lower fat-free mass, lower physical activity energy expenditure, and lower peak oxygen uptake than non-MONW women. Plasma cholesterol level was higher in MONW women, whereas no differences were noted for other blood lipids, ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, and resting energy expenditure. MONW women had lower dietary restraint scores than non-MONW women, but no differences were noted in disinhibition, hunger, and dietary intake. Stepwise regression analysis performed on all subjects showed that 33.5% of the unique variance of the homeostasis model assessment was explained with the variables of percentage of body fat (17.1%), level of dietary restraint (10.4%), and age (6%). Both metabolic and dietary behavioral variables contribute to the deleterious metabolic profile of MONW women. They display lower insulin sensitivity due potentially to a cluster of sedentary behavior patterns that contribute to their higher adiposity. Furthermore, cognitive attitudes toward food (i.e. dietary restraint) and concomitant lifestyle behaviors may play a role in regulating insulin sensitivity in MONW women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations215
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207