MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164656870 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2006.875381

A Subspace Multiuser Beamforming Algorithm for the Downlink in Mobile Communications

2006· article· en· W2164656870 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Wang, P. Agathoklis, A. Antoniou

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingTelecommunications linkBase stationComputer scienceSubspace topologyMultiuser detectionOptimization problemAlgorithmMathematical optimizationInterference (communication)MathematicsTelecommunicationsCode division multiple accessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new algorithm for downlink multiuser beamforming in mobile communications is described. The optimization problem is reformulated by modifying the constraints so that weight vectors of different mobile stations are optimized in a reduced feasible region which is a subset of that of the multiuser beamforming problem. The downlink beamforming weight vectors of different mobile stations are then jointly optimized in a subspace instead of searching in the entire parameter space. Simulation results show that the modified optimization problem leads to solutions that satisfy the signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio specification at each mobile station and that the total power transmitted from the base station is very close to the optimal one. The solution of the modified optimization problem requires significantly less computation than the optimal multiuser beamforming algorithms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal ProcessingSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207