MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164694211 · doi:10.1017/s1446788712000134

RATIONAL APPROXIMATIONS TO VALUES OF BELL POLYNOMIALS AT POINTS INVOLVING EULER’S CONSTANT AND ZETA VALUES

2012· preprint· en· W2164694211 on OpenAlexaff
Khodabakhsh Hessami Pilehrood, Tatiana Hessami Pilehrood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Australian Mathematical Society · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersSchool of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental SciencesInstitute for Research in Fundamental SciencesAbdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
KeywordsEuler's formulaMathematicsConstant (computer programming)Mathematical physicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we present new explicit simultaneous rational approximations which converge subexponentially to the values of the Bell polynomials at the points where m =1,2,…, a , a ∈ℕ, γ is Euler’s constant and ζ is the Riemann zeta function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Australian Mathematical SocietySame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207