MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164695382 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0454

Simultaneous emergence of curved space–time and quantum mechanics

2015· article· en· W2164695382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. S. De, Farook Rahaman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsPhysicsSpacetimeCurved spaceSpinorClassical mechanicsGeneral relativityEinstein field equationsFriedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metricMathematical physicsSpace timeQuantum field theory in curved spacetimeRiemannian geometryQuantum gravityTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsUniverseQuantumMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown in this paper that the geometrically structureless space–time manifold is converted instantaneously to a curved, a Riemannian, or may be a Finslerian space–time with an associated Riemannian space–time, on the appearance of quantum Weyl spinors dependent only on time in a background flat manifold and having the symplectic property in the abstract space of spinors. The scenario depicts simultaneous emergence of gravity in accord with general relativity and quantum mechanics. The emergent gravity leads to the generalized uncertainty principle, which in turn ushers in discrete space–time. The emerged space–time is specified here as to be Finslerian and the field equation in that space–time has been obtained from the classical one due to the arising quantized space and time. From this field equation we find the quantum field equation for highly massive (of the Planck order) spinors in the associated Riemannian space of the Finsler space, which is in fact, the background homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Robertson–Walker space–time of the universe. These highly massive spinors provide the mass distribution complying with the Einstein equivalence principle. All these occurred in the indivisible minimum time considered as zero time or spontaneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207