Spiral Arterial Remodeling Is Not Essential for Normal Blood Pressure Regulation in Pregnant Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maternal cardiovascular adaptations occur in normal pregnancy, systemically, and within the uterus. In humans, gestational control of blood pressure is clinically important. Transient structural remodeling of endometrial spiral arteries normally occurs in human and mouse pregnancies. In mice, this depends on uterine natural killer cell function. Using normal and immune-deficient mice, we asked whether spiral artery remodeling critically regulates gestational mean arterial pressure and/or placental growth. Radiotelemetric transmitters were implanted in females and hemodynamic profiles to a dietary salt challenge and to pregnancy were assessed. Implantation sites from noninstrumented females were used for histological morphometry. Both normal and immune-deficient mice had normal sensitivity to salt and showed similar 5-phase gestational patterns of mean arterial pressure correlating with stages of placental development, regardless of spiral artery modification. After implantation, mean arterial pressure declined during the preplacental phase to reach a midgestation nadir. With gestation day 9 opening of placental circulation, pressure rose, reaching baseline before parturition, whereas heart rate dropped. Heart rate stabilized before parturition. Placental sizes deviated during late gestation when growth stopped in normal mice but continued in immune-deficient mice. As an indication of the potential for abnormal hemodynamics, 2 pregnant females delivering dead offspring developed late gestational hypertension. This study characterizes a dynamic pattern of blood pressure over mouse pregnancy that parallels human gestation. Unexpectedly, these data reveal that spiral artery remodeling is not required for normal gestational control of blood pressure or for normal placental growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".