A Quantum Chemical and TST Study of the OH Hydrogen-Abstraction Reaction from Substituted Aldehydes: FCHO and ClCHO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, ab initio methods have been used to study the OH hydrogen-abstraction reaction from two substituted aldehydes: FCHO and ClCHO. A complex mechanism in which the overall rate depends on the rates of two competitive reactions, a reversible step where a reactant (or prereactive) complex is formed, followed by the irreversible hydrogen abstraction to form the products, is corroborated. This mechanism was previously shown to describe accurately the kinetics of the OH hydrogen-abstraction reaction from formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Classical transition state theory (TST) rate constants calculated with tunneling corrections, assuming an unsymmetrical Eckart barrier, agree very well with experimental upper bound values. Activation energy barriers and enthalpies of reaction have been estimated through CCSD(T) single point calculations using MP2 geometries and frequencies and the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".