MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164714910 · doi:10.1109/icip.2002.1037984

Color-based mouth shape tracking for synthesizing realistic facial expressions

2003· article· en· W2164714910 on OpenAlexaff
Lijun Yin, Anup Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionFace (sociological concept)Facial expressionCoding (social sciences)Pattern recognition (psychology)Process (computing)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mouth shape analysis and synthesis play an important role for realistic facial expression generation. The conventional deformable template-based method requires a fairly accurate initial localization of the template because the energy minimization process only finds a local minimum. We present a new method for accurate mouth corner detection and mouth shape estimation using color information. The proposed method can deal with a variety of shapes for both open and closed positions of the mouth. Accurate mouth corner detection and mouth status determination (open and closed) increases the accuracy of template initialization. The extracted mouth shape parameters can be used for synthesizing realistic virtual facial expressions in model based coding. Experiments on video sequences demonstrate the advantage of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - International Conference on Image ProcessingSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207