MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164741153 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0067

Exact solution of an electro-osmotic flow problem in a cylindrical channel of polymer electrolyte membranes

2009· article· en· W2164741153 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Berg, Kehinde O. Ladipo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMembranePoisson–Boltzmann equationElectric fieldDragElectro-osmosisPolymerMechanicsMaterials scienceIonCharge densityPoisson's equationChemistryPhysicsChromatographyMathematical analysisComposite materialElectrodeMathematicsElectrophoresisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electric potential of counter-ions (protons) in an infinite cylindrical channel is presented as a solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation, involving a constant ion charge density along the wall. The distribution of protons is derived and used subsequently to compute the velocity profile and mass flow rate of the corresponding electro-osmotic flow, driven by an electric field. Analytical expressions are derived for all quantities, including the conductivity and water drag coefficient. This analysis relates especially to cylindrical nano-channels of polymer electrolyte membranes such as Nafion and addresses the validity of continuum models for these materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207