MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164741153 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0067

Exact solution of an electro-osmotic flow problem in a cylindrical channel of polymer electrolyte membranes

2009· article· en· W2164741153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMembranePoisson–Boltzmann equationElectric fieldDragElectro-osmosisPolymerMechanicsMaterials scienceIonCharge densityPoisson's equationChemistryPhysicsChromatographyMathematical analysisComposite materialElectrodeMathematicsElectrophoresisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electric potential of counter-ions (protons) in an infinite cylindrical channel is presented as a solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation, involving a constant ion charge density along the wall. The distribution of protons is derived and used subsequently to compute the velocity profile and mass flow rate of the corresponding electro-osmotic flow, driven by an electric field. Analytical expressions are derived for all quantities, including the conductivity and water drag coefficient. This analysis relates especially to cylindrical nano-channels of polymer electrolyte membranes such as Nafion and addresses the validity of continuum models for these materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it