Developmental consequences of alternative <i>Bcl‐x</i> splicing during preimplantation embryo development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elevated cell death in human preimplantation embryos is one of the cellular events compromising pregnancy rates after assisted reproductive technology treatments. We therefore explored the molecular pathways regulating cell death at the blastocyst stage in human embryos cultured in vitro. Owing to limited availability of human embryos, these pathways were further characterized in mouse blastocysts. Gene expression studies revealed a positive correlation between the cell death index and the expression of Bcl-x transcript. Cell death activation in human blastocysts was accompanied by changes in Bcl-x splicing, favoring production of Bcl-xS, an activator of cell death. Expression of Bcl-xS was detected in a subset of human blastocysts that show particular clustering in dying and/or dead cells. Altering the Bcl-xL/Bcl-xS ratio in mouse embryos, in antisense experiments, confirmed that upregulation of Bcl-xS, with concomitant downregulation of Bcl-xL, compromised developmental potential and committed a subset of cells to undergoing cell death. This was accompanied by increased accumulation of reactive oxygen species levels without any impact on mtDNA content. In addition, altered Bcl-x splicing in favor of Bcl-xS was stimulated by culture in HTF medium or by addition of excessive glucose, leading to compromised embryo development. Thus, we conclude that inappropriate culture conditions affect Bcl-x isoform expression, contributing to compromised preimplantation embryo development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".