Fuzzy J-Means and VNS methods for clustering genes from microarray data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: In the interpretation of gene expression data from a group of microarray experiments that include samples from either different patients or conditions, special consideration must be given to the pleiotropic and epistatic roles of genes, as observed in the variation of gene coexpression patterns. Crisp clustering methods assign each gene to one cluster, thereby omitting information about the multiple roles of genes. RESULTS: Here, we present the application of a local search heuristic, Fuzzy J-Means, embedded into the variable neighborhood search metaheuristic for the clustering of microarray gene expression data. We show that for all the datasets studied this algorithm outperforms the standard Fuzzy C-Means heuristic. Different methods for the utilization of cluster membership information in determining gene coregulation are presented. The clustering and data analyses were performed on simulated datasets as well as experimental cDNA microarray data for breast cancer and human blood from the Stanford Microarray Database. AVAILABILITY: The source code of the clustering software (C programming language) is freely available from Nabil.Belacel@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".