MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164848337 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2010.2048389

A Distortion-Compensated Charge Transfer Amplifier for a 1.66-MHz Cyclic Pipeline ADC

2010· article· en· W2164848337 on OpenAlexaff
Tejinder Singh Sandhu, Kamal El‐Sankary, E.I. El-Masry

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierLinearityElectrical engineeringTransistorOperational amplifierMaterials scienceDistortion (music)PhysicsOptoelectronicsCMOSElectronic engineeringDirect-coupled amplifierVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A distortion-compensated charge transfer amplifier (DCCTA) is proposed to improve the linearity constraints of the differential charge transfer amplifier (DCTA). The proposed DCCTA effectively reduces distortion at its output by source degeneration, cross coupling, and making the drain-to-source voltage of the amplifying transistor independent of the applied input signal. This DCCTA yields an effective number of bits of 9.26 bits, compared with 6.05 bits for the DCTA at 40 MHz while consuming only 13.5 μW from a 1.2-V source. A 1.66-MHz cyclic pipeline analog-to-digital converter employing this DCCTA as a residue amplifier was simulated using 90-nm CMOS process, resulting in a peak resolution of 9.21 bits, without being limited by the thermal noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207