MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164852997 · doi:10.1080/10425170290034507

Sequence Analysis of a Hoxa4 - Hoxa5 Intergenic Region Including Shared Regulatory Elements

2002· article· en· W2164852997 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie Moreau, Lucie Jeannotte

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA sequence · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthUniversité Laval
KeywordsHox geneBiologyGeneticsRegulatory sequenceGeneHomeotic geneIntergenic regionPromoterHomology (biology)Sequence analysisTranscription factorRegulation of gene expressionDNA binding siteGene expressionGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic patterns of Hox gene expression are generated by a combination of regulatory elements differentially controlling Hox gene transcription in a spatio-temporal and tissue-specific fashion. Regulatory elements can either be exclusive for a particular gene, shared by neighboring Hox genes, or be competed for by different promoters. Our interest in Hoxa5 gene function and regulation have led us to localize Hoxa5 cis-acting regulatory elements in the intergenic region between the Hoxa4 and Hoxa5 genes and involved in Hoxa5 organ expression. Mapping of the region and sequence analysis revealed some discrepancies with a previously published sequence. Here, we report an additional DNA fragment of 282 base pairs that possesses high homology with the human HOX sequence, and contains potential binding sites for trans-acting factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA sequenceSame topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207