MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164854252 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090310

Cogging torque of permanent magnet electric machiens: An overview

2009· article· en· W2164854252 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenhong Guo, Liuchen Chang, Yaosuo Xue

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCogging torqueStatorRotor (electric)TorqueDirect torque controlMagnetComputer scienceMagnetic reluctanceMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsInduction motorVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent magnet electric machine (PMEM) is widely employed in variety of applications because of their numerous advantages beyond other electric machines. Cogging torque is caused by the reluctance change between the stator teeth and magnet poles on the rotor, this is an inherent characteristic of PMEM. In many applications, cogging torque has become one important design specifications and consideration issues of PMEM. Study of cogging torque calculation methods and the cogging torque reduction measures are becoming more and more important nowadays. In this paper, the cogging torque calculation methods are introduced, and various practical cogging torque reduction measures are studied and compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207