MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164866926 · doi:10.1109/twc.2007.06020009

Exact Error Rate Analysis of Output-Threshold Generalized Selection Combining (OT-GSC)

2007· article· en· W2164866926 on OpenAlexaff
Hong‐Chuan Yang, Le Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRayleigh fadingSelection (genetic algorithm)Probability density functionDiversity combiningCumulative distribution functionStatisticsMathematicsMaximal-ratio combiningWord error rateMoment-generating functionFadingComputer scienceAlgorithmApplied mathematicsSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalized selection combining (GSC) is one of the most widely investigated low-complexity diversity techniques. Recently, output-threshold GSC (OT-GSC) was proposed as a power-saving variant of traditional GSC scheme. In this paper, we present an exact performance analysis of OT-GSC over Rayleigh fading channels. In particular, we derive the cumulative distribution function (CDF), probability density function (PDF) and moment generation function (MGF) of the combined SNR with OT-GSC. Then, we apply these results to study the outage probability and average error rate performance of OT-GSC. This analysis allows for a thorough and accurate comparison of OT-GSC with other variants of GSC, such as minimum selection GSC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207