MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164872505 · doi:10.1109/chinasip.2013.6625395

The spatial shift operations on image reconstruction from 2D-FRFT information with application to SAR moving target detection

2013· article· en· W2164872505 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lei Gao, Lin Qi, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarFractional Fourier transformComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceInvariant (physics)Fourier transformIterative reconstructionInverse synthetic aperture radarImage (mathematics)Frequency domainRadar imagingAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)RadarMathematicsFourier analysisTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the property of spatial shift operation on image reconstruction from amplitude and phase information in two-dimensional Fractional Fourier Transform (2D-FRFT) is studied through mathematical analysis and computer simulations. From the analysis presented in this paper, the phase information is spatial shift-invariant for image reconstruction in the 2D-FRFT domain while the amplitude information is not. Based on the analysis, we proposed a novel method to detect moving targets in the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. The effectiveness of the proposed solution is demonstrated through experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsFrench-language works237,207