MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A multilayer control framework for distribution systems with high DG penetration

2011· article· en· W2164880388 on OpenAlexaff
Hany E. Z. Farag, Ehab F. El‐Saadany, Lana El Chaar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisorPenetration (warfare)Distributed generationDistributed computingTap changerComputer scienceSmart gridMulti-agent systemDistribution management systemDecentralised systemCapacitorGridLayer (electronics)Electric power systemShunt (medical)Distributed power generationControl engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Materials scienceNanotechnologyVoltageRenewable energyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a multilayer distributed multi-agent framework under the smart grid umbrella is proposed as a control structure to tackle technical challenges for distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generation. The proposed multi-agent control structure has been divided into three main layers. In the first layer, the functions of the local agents is defined according to the concept of intelligent agents and the characteristic of the individual DG and utility devices such as load tap changer, shunt capacitors and protection devices. Based on the concepts of microgrids, cells and virtual power plants, regional coordination agents are defined and chosen as a second layer. To achieve global objective(s), the distribution management system DMS is selected as the highest layer supervisor agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207