MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164884304 · doi:10.1109/mper.2001.4311172

Online Detection and Location of Low-Level Arcing in Dry-Type Transformers

2001· article· en· W2164884304 on OpenAlexaff
T.S. Sidhu, G.S. Sagoo, Manoj Sachdev

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitchgearElectric arcEnclosureTransformerElectrical engineeringVoltageLow voltageMaterials scienceElectrodeEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the development of a microprocessor-based system, based on four different physical phenomena, for reliable and accurate detection and location of arcing in dry-type transformers. The proposed technique was tested for actual arcing, generated on a 15kVA, 230/115 V Y/Δ transformer enclosed in a 30"×30"×21" metallic enclosure. Some results showing the performance of the detection and location system are presented in the article. The technique can be applied to detect arcing in metal-clad low-voltage/medium-voltage switchgear, drives, GIS (gas insulated switchgear), generator bus-ducts, and other metal-clad electrical apparatus against arcing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering ReviewSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207