MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164888948 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2009.5117855

Streaming capacity in P2P VoD systems

2009· article· en· W2164888948 on OpenAlexaff
Yifeng He, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLive streamingBandwidth (computing)Real Time Streaming ProtocolComputer networkUpper and lower boundsVideo streamingVideo on demandThe InternetPeer-to-peerDecompositionStreaming currentDistributed computingMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Video-on-Demand (VoD) has become a popular service on the Internet. However current P2P VoD systems can only provide a video at a low streaming rate. The upper bound of the streaming rate that a P2P VoD system can support becomes an attractive topic. In this paper, we investigate the streaming capacity in P2P VoD systems, which is defined as the maximum supported streaming rate that can be received by every receiver. We formulate the streaming capacity problem considering the bandwidth constraints, and find the optimal solution to this problem. Furthermore, we develop a proximal decomposition algorithm to achieve the streaming capacity in a distributed manner. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed proximal decomposition algorithm can obtain the streaming capacity very close to the optimal result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207