Inhibition of the malate–aspartate shuttle by pre-ischaemic aminooxyacetate loading of the heart induces cardioprotection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Preserved mitochondrial function is essential for protection against ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. The malate-aspartate (MA) shuttle constitutes the principal pathway for transport of reducing cytosolic equivalents for mitochondrial oxidation. We hypothesized that a transient shut-down of the MA-shuttle by aminooxyacetate (AOA) during ischaemia and early reperfusion modulates IR injury by mechanisms comparable to ischaemic preconditioning (IPC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolated perfused rat hearts exposed to 40 min global no-flow ischaemia were studied in: (i) control, (ii) pre-ischaemic AOA (0.1 mM), (iii) IPC, and (iv) AOA+IPC hearts. IR injury was evaluated by infarct size and haemodynamic recovery. Tracer-estimated glucose oxidation and metabolic changes in glycogen, lactate, pyruvate, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates, and ATP degradation products were measured. The effects of AOA on complex I respiration and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production were examined in isolated rabbit mitochondria. Treatment with AOA, IPC, or AOA+IPC induced significant infarct reduction; 28 ± 6, 30 ± 3, and 18 ± 1%, respectively, vs. 52 ± 5% of left ventricular (LV) mass for control (P < 0.01 for all). LV-developed pressure improved to 60 ± 3, 63 ± 5 and 53 ± 4 vs. 31 ± 5 mmHg (P < 0.01 for all) after 2 h reperfusion. Pre-ischaemic AOA administration inhibited glycolysis and increased glucose oxidation during post-ischaemic reperfusion similar to IPC, and suppressed complex I respiration and ROS production in the non-ischaemic heart. Changes in lactate, pyruvate, TCA intermediates, and ATP end products suggested an AOA inhibition of the MA-shuttle during late ischaemia and early reperfusion. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of the MA-shuttle during ischaemia and early reperfusion is proposed as a mechanism to reduce IR injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".