Preparation and characterization of gelatin from collagen biomass obtained through a pH-shifting process of mechanically separated turkey meat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gelatins were extracted from mechanically separated turkey meat following 2 different approaches. The first method was based on a 2-stage batch extraction at 50 and 60°C, respectively, whereas the second method consisted of recovering gelatin from a collagen biomass obtained during a pH-shifting process. The yield of gelatin produced by the latter method was twice that obtained by the former method (13.51 and 6.36%, respectively). The chemical composition, as well as the rheological and the functional properties, of all extracted gelatins were evaluated. Gelatin recovered from the collagen biomass had higher molecular weight components and significantly greater (P < 0.05) bloom value (353.2 g) compared with thermally extracted gelatins. However, gelatin extracted at 60°C possessed higher (P < 0.05) foaming properties, as well as better emulsifying activity, than gelatin extracted from the 50°C treatment and the collagen biomass. The present study revealed that high-quality gelatins can be prepared from mechanically separated turkey meat through precipitation and thermal solubilization of collagen biomass obtained during a pH-shifting process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it