MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164896400 · doi:10.7202/031952ar

L’exogamie et le maintien de deux langues et de deux cultures : le rôle de la francité familioscolaire

2007· article· fr· W2164896400 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFrenchPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteurs comparent le vécu langagier et le développement psycholangagier, en français et en anglais, de deux groupes d'élèves du secondaire vivant en milieu minoritaire francophone; il s'agit d'élèves issus de familles exogames francophone-anglophone et d'élèves issus de couples endogames francophones. Les résultats montrent un vécu langagier nettement plus anglodominant chez les enfants des couples exogames mais, lorsqu'on tient compte du degré de francité familioscolaire, l'exogamie n'est aucunement, ou fort peu, associée au développement psycholangagier des élèves. La francité familioscolaire, par contre, est fortement associée à ce développement. La recherche démontre la nécessité de distinguer entre l'exogamie comme structure familiale et l'exogamie comme dynamique sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it