Ginsenosides 20(<i>S</i>)-protopanaxadiol and Rh2 reduce cell proliferation and increase sub-G<sub>1</sub>cells in two cultured intestinal cell lines, Int-407 and Caco-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ginsenosides derived from 20(S)-protopanaxatriol (PT) and 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (PD) groups had similar characteristic cytotoxic effects on the growth of two intestinal cells lines, Int-407 and Caco-2. Pure Rh2, a ginsenoside structurally related to PD, inhibited intestinal cell growth at greater than twice the concentration of PD, while Rh1, a ginsenoside structurally related to aglycone PT, had no cytotoxic effect. Concentrations causing growth inhibition of 50% of cells (LC50) for the compounds PD, PT, and Rh2 were 23, 26, and 53 microg/mL, respectively, for Int-407 cells. In comparison, the LC50 for PD and PT was determined to be 24 microg/mL, and that for Rh2 was 55 microg/mL in Caco-2 cells. A standardized North American ginseng extract with a known ginsenosides composition did not induce cytotoxicity in either of the intestinal cell lines. Cell cycle analysis showed characteristically different (P = 0.05) effects of ginsenosides PD, Rh2, and PT in both cell lines. Rh2 treatment of Int-407 caused a significantly (P = 0.05) higher production of sub-G1 (apoptotic) cells (35% +/- 1%) compared with untreated cells (14% +/- 0.3%) after 24 h. PD and Rh2 treatments were both significantly (P < 0.05) higher in apoptotic cells than in untreated cells after 48 and 72 h. Similar results were obtained for treatment of Caco-2 cells. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in both cell lines was similar for PD and Rh2 and higher (P = 0.05) than for PT treatment at most time periods. These results show a specific structure-function relationship for bioactive ginsenosides in two contrasting intestinal cell types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".