MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164926275 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-3708

Turbulent Flow Past Single and a Pair of Rectangular Cylinders at Incidence

2009· article· en· W2164926275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Hydro
KeywordsTurbulenceFlow (mathematics)MechanicsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4A particle image velocimetry system was employed to study the characteristics of turbulent wake generated by a single and a pair of identical rectangular cylinders at incidence in an open channel. Each cylinder has a nominal thickness, d = 9 mm, length, L = 36 mm and height, H = 190 mm. The experiments were performed for the following angles of incidence: α = 0°, 10°, and 20°, and at a centre-to-centre spacing of b = 50 mm for the cylinder pairs. The flow depth was 125 mm, and the Reynolds number based on the freestream velocity and cylinder thickness was 2925. The results reveal that the mean velocities, turbulence quantities, and wake half-width increase with increasing cylinder inclination and number of cylinder. The mean velocity defect profiles collapse fairly well onto each other for all cases. Unlike the aligned cylinders, the wake half-width values for the inclined cylinders decrease first, and then increase thereafter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it