MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164931020 · doi:10.1517/17530059.2.5.475

Secretory vesicle analysis for discovery of low abundance plasma biomarkers

2008· article· en· W2164931020 on OpenAlexaff
Joël Lanoix, Eustache Paramithiotis

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCaprion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomarker discoverySecretory proteinBiomarkerSecretionBiologySecretory pathwayProteomicsComputational biologySignal peptideCell biologyProstate cancerBioinformaticsCancerBiochemistryPeptide sequenceGeneGolgi apparatusEndoplasmic reticulumGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pathological conditions can be reflected, as well as propagated, by changes in the expression patterns of secreted proteins. Protein secretion may occur by signal sequence dependent or independent mechanisms and many secreted proteins with desirable biomarker characteristics appear to be low abundance proteins in body fluids. Both factors complicate disease-associated secreted protein discovery. OBJECTIVE: To enhance the discovery of low abundance, physiologically relevant, plasma protein biomarkers. METHODS: Biomarker discovery has been performed in media, body fluids or tissue homogenates. A comparative analysis of the contents of secretory vesicles isolated directly from affected tissues or model systems substantially improves the detection of relevant, low abundance plasma biomarkers. RESULTS: Evidence supporting this approach is provided from pilot experiments in prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Medical DiagnosticsSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207