Measurement of Palladium Crust Thickness on Catalysts by Optical Microscopy and Image Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selective hydrogenation is an important process in petrochemistry to purify feedstock for polymer synthesis. For this process, catalysts containing metallic palladium deposited with an eggshell distribution on porous alumina are usually employed. For this kind of catalyst, the activity is known to be in close relation with the thickness of the palladium crust. As palladium oxide is brown and alumina is white, the palladium distribution in a catalyst bead before the reduction step can be characterized by optical microscopy. We propose an original and automatic procedure of optical image analysis to obtain a fast and robust method to measure the mean crust thickness of a catalyst batch and the corresponding standard deviation. The approach is validated by two different methods. First, we compared the crust thickness with those obtained by electron probe microanalysis. Then, catalytic tests of four samples with varying palladium crust thicknesses were performed and confirmed the expected correlation between activity and crust thickness measured by optical microscopy coupled with image analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it