FAIR TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT: WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF MAINSTREAMING?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un aspecto crítico de la crisis global actual tiene qué ver con la difícil condición en la que se encuentran los pequeños productores, en particular los que operan en el sector de la agricultura. Una iniciativa que trata de enfrentar la situación de los pequeños productores agrícolas es la red de Comercio Equitativo certificado. Con la intención, inicialmente, de representar una forma alternativa de relaciones comerciales, la certificación del Comercio Equitativo ha ofrecido a los miembros de las organizaciones de pequeños productores precios más altos para sus productos respecto a los del mercado mundial – y a la vez ha proveído otros beneficios (pagos anticipados, un premio social para los proyectos de desarrollo comunitario, asistencia técnica, contratos a largo plazo, etc.). Sin embargo, en los últimos años la red del Comercio Equitativo ha sido fuertemente criticada por haber permitido una creciente e indiscriminada participación de empresarios. Este artículo examina brevemente los efectos de la participación de las empresas en el comercio equitativo y sus implicaciones para el desarrollo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.040 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.053 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.029 | 0.041 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".