New evidence for a large Palaeoproterozoic impact: spherules in a dolomite layer in the Ketilidian orogen, South Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An unconformable sedimentary succession deposited between c. 2130–1848 Ma on Archaean gneisses of the foreland of the Palaeoproterozoic Ketilidian orogen includes a layer with coarse sand-sized silicate spherules. The layer is c. 1 m thick and consists mainly of coarse diagenetic dolomite. In addition to c. 18% spherules, the layer also contains 3% well-sorted, very fine quartzose sand and 6% larger intraclasts of chert and carbonate. The spherules were previously interpreted as microfossils ( Vallenia sp.) because of their spheroidal shapes and inclusions of carbonaceous matter. The spherules are reinterpreted as replaced impact ejecta because they have shapes typical of splash-form microtektites, some contain possible examples of replaced skeletal spinel crystals, perlitic cracks and devitrification spherulites, and non-spherical particles with shapes and textures of typical glassy and scoriaceous volcanic ash are absent. The carbonaceous matter is attributed to hydrocarbons that migrated into the spherule layer from elsewhere in the sedimentary succession. The spherules were reworked after deposition, probably as a result of turbidity currents or storm- or impact-induced waves. Analysis of one spherule-bearing sample revealed only 0.02 ppb iridium, a value comparable with low iridium abundances in distal layers of other terrestrial impact ejecta. The spherules in South Greenland are the first distal impact ejecta recognized in mid-Precambrian strata. They represent a major impact because their aggregate thickness exceeds the thickest spherule accumulations reported from the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer. Given their loosely constrained age and the implied scale of the impact, the Ketilidian spherules could be distal ejecta from either the Vredefort, South Africa, ( c. 2025 Ma) or Sudbury, Canada, ( c. 1850 Ma) impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".