MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165033358 · doi:10.1109/aps.2006.1711015

High order S-MRTD time-domain modeling of fading characteristics of wireless channels

2006· article· en· W2165033358 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Alighanbari, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingFinite-difference time-domain methodTime domainComputer scienceWirelessElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmScalingFading distributionTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringRayleigh fadingOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, high order time-domain S-MRTD (scaling function-based multiresolution time-domain) schemes were applied to characterize fading effects in an indoor wireless channel. The fading characteristics were observed to vary largely with the values of electrical properties of the construction materials. Such detailed considerations are not taken into account by statistical models. On the other hand, S-MRTD was observed to be effectively functional at coarser grids, compared to the traditional FDTD, resulting in significant reduction of memory and CPU-time. Such a deterministic approach provides a more accurate system characterization, compared to the measurement-based AF models. Finally, the proposed technique can characterize a channel at a resolution of centimeters, practically impossible for a measurement campaign

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International SymposiumSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207