MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165040032 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2005.1604297

Combined Beamforming and Noise Cancellation

2006· article· en· W2165040032 on OpenAlexaff
Jacek Dmochowski, Rafik Goubran

Bibliographic record

Venue2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceNoise (video)MicrophoneAdaptive beamformerSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)SIGNAL (programming language)Noise measurementMicrophone arrayActive noise controlElectronic engineeringSet (abstract data type)Signal processingNoise-canceling microphoneAcousticsSpeech recognitionEngineeringNoise reductionTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines microphone-array-based, combined beamformer-noise canceller structures. The performance of the structures is evaluated using computer simulation as well as experimental measurements. The inter-operation of the beamformer and noise canceller is studied by measuring the SNR improvements offered by the respective components. An experimental procedure for evaluating output SNR is presented: the desired signal is captured from a set location in the recording environment. The noise signal is measured from a second (generally different) location. Results reveal an SNR improvement of up to 17 dB, and are compared to those stemming from conventional approaches

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference ProceedingsSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207