MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165050191 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277719

Extracting Document Semantics for Semantic Header

2006· article· en· W2165050191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeaderInformation retrievalSemantics (computer science)Search engine indexingContext (archaeology)Key (lock)Generator (circuit theory)Programming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate indexing and cataloguing of electronic information on the Internet is the foundation for precise retrieval. Most existing search systems, however, tend to generate misses and false hits due to the fact that they attempt to match the specified search terms in the target information resources without considering context. It is clear that using traditional keyword-based methods for representing semantics of information items has become a major obstacle to high precision. The notion of semantic header proposed previously captures the semantics of information resources that takes into account the logical structure of an information item. The contents of semantic header may be used by modern search systems to help locate an appropriate information item with minimum effort. In this paper, we present a system, called automatic semantic header generator (ASHG), for generating five key components of the semantic header. Finally, we evaluate the system with two sets of documents, and analyze the corresponding results

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWeb Data Mining and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207