MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2165069888

U-shaped rectangular patch microstrip antenna element for base station antennas

2006· article· en· W2165069888 on OpenAlexaff
Enver Hamiti, Luan Ahma, A. Sebak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaAcousticsMicrostripBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringDirectional antennaAntenna (radio)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract:- In this paper, a new design for microstrip antenna element with U-shaped rectangular patch for sectored coverage of base station antennas of 900 MHz system is proposed for improving antenna performance in terms of gain and bandwidth. A superstrate or dielectric cover is used to protect the patch against environmental hazard. We have present also another solution using air dielectric as a superstrate, which is a much lighter and cheaper solution A green’s function based mixed potential integral equation in conjuction with the method of moments is implemented for the formulation and analysis of the microstrip structures. For this contribution, design aspects and the obtained simulated results for the proposed antenna are presented. 1 Basic Formulations: For an simple region as in Fig.1. the current in radiating elements and feeding elements is expanded into a set of basis functions: ρ N

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and Analysis→French-language works237,207→