Strategic Representation of an Abstract Reality: Spiraling Relations between Organizational Culture and Innovativeness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Innovation is still one of the most debated topics among the academics and business professionals. The question of how organizations innovate captures attention from many disciplines and leads to extensive amount of research. Although there are many variables that affect an organization’s innovative performance, organizational culture can be considered as a key issue as it is strongly associated with the values, attitudes, behaviors and organizational practices. As organizations have different cultural profiles and, in many cases, competing cultural values exist within the organization simultaneously, it is difficult to build one-dimensional linkages about the relations between organizational culture and innovativeness. This study aims to analyze the relations between innovativeness and four different organizational cultures including team, entrepreneurial, hierarchical and rational cultures. A sample of 371 surveys was collected from five leading companies operating in the chemicals industry in Eskisehir, Turkey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it