Structure and Mechanism of the Saposin-like Domain of a Plant Aspartic Protease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many plant aspartic proteases contain an additional sequence of ~100 amino acids termed the plant-specific insert, which is involved in host defense and vacuolar targeting. Similar to all saposin-like proteins, the plant-specific insert functions via protein-membrane interactions; however, the structural basis for such interactions has not been studied, and the nature of plant-specific insert-mediated membrane disruption has not been characterized. In the present study, the crystal structure of the saposin-like domain of potato aspartic protease was resolved at a resolution of 1.9 Å, revealing an open V-shaped configuration similar to the open structure of human saposin C. Notably, vesicle disruption activity followed Michaelis-Menten-like kinetics, a finding not previously reported for saposin-like proteins including plant-specific inserts. Circular dichroism data suggested that secondary structure was pH-dependent in a fashion similar to influenza A hemagglutinin fusion peptide. Membrane effects characterized by atomic force microscopy and light scattering indicated bilayer solubilization as well as fusogenic activity. Taken together, the present study is the first report to elucidate the membrane interaction mechanism of plant saposin-like domains whereby pH-dependent membrane interactions resulted in bilayer fusogenic activity that probably arose from a viral type pH-dependent helix-kink-helix motif at the plant-specific insert N terminus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".