MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165095220 · doi:10.1177/002198940203700210

Sleeping With the Enemy: Patriot Games in Fictions by Lesbia Harford, Gwen Kelly, and Joan Dugdale

2002· article· en· W2165095220 on OpenAlex
Donna Coates

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Commonwealth Literature · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIronyHistoryAdversaryFront (military)Art historyArtLawLiteraturePolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In her ‘‘Preface’’ to Struggle of Memory, Joan Dugdale notes with some irony that she is completing her novel just as Australia is celebrating the seventy-fifth anniversary of the first AIF’s landing at Gallipoli, ‘‘an event which, according to the overwhelmingly masculine anthology of this nation, symbolises Australia’s coming of age’’; by contrast, the kind of war story she tells, which shifts the focus from the battlefront to the home front, has also been instrumental in shaping Australian society, but it has been ‘‘almost completely repressed’’ (p. xi). Lest readers have forgotten the shocking details of her story, Dugdale provides a brief synopsis:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it