Ultrastructure of the hostpathogen interface in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> leaves infected by the downy mildew <i>Hyaloperonospora parasitica</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmission electron microscopy was used to examine the hostpathogen interface in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. leaves infected by the biotrophic downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora parasitica (Pers.:Fr.) Constant. Both conventionally fixed as well as high-pressure frozen samples were examined. Excellent preservation of the hostpathogen interface was obtained in many of our high-pressure frozen samples and provided information not available in conventionally fixed samples. Mature haustoria of H. parasitica were distinctly pyriform in shape. A small collar of host cell wall material surrounded the neck of each haustorium near the host cell wall penetration site. The presence of callose in collars was demonstrated using immunogold labeling with a monoclonal antibody specific for (1→3)-β-glucans. The body of each haustorium was ensheathed by an invaginated portion of the invaded host-cell plasma membrane known as the extrahaustorial membrane. Lying between this membrane and the haustorial wall was a layer of electron-dense material known as the extrahaustorial matrix (EHM). The EHM typically was thicker at the distal end of a haustorium than at the proximal end. The surface of the EHM covered by the extrahaustorial membrane was highly irregular in outline. Considerable vesicular activity was observed in association with the extrahaustorial membrane.Key words: transmission electron microscopy, high-pressure freezing, haustoria, Peronospora parasitica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".