MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2165122488

La implicación de las provincias canadienses en la competencia sobre inmigración

2014· article· es· W2165122488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalia Camacho

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista "Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad" · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEl presente articulo se centra en el estudio de los acuerdos de inmigracion celebrados a partir de la decada de los noventa entre la Federacion y las provincias canadienses (a excepcion de Quebec). Los acuerdos incluyen tanto la posibilidad de seleccionar una parte de la inmigracion que llega al territorio de cada provincia, como la gestion provincial de los programas de primera acogida e integracion. En la primera parte se estudian los acuerdos firmados con Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia y Ontario, para posteriormente analizar el impacto de los mismos tanto en el modelo migratorio, como en el modelo federal canadiense. El articulo concluye que los acuerdos han disminuido el nivel de asimetria en relacion a la competencia sobre inmigracion, pero sin llegar a eliminarla. Ademas, la gestion realizada por las provincias pone en evidencia la necesidad de repasar los perfiles migratorios altamente cualificados y la necesidad de implementar mecanismos de coordinacion para evitar distorsiones en el modelo migratorio. EnglishThe current article is focused in the study of the migration agreements that took place since 1990s between the Canadian Federation and the Canadian provinces (with the exception of Quebec). These agreements include both the possibility to select a portion of the immigration that arrives to each province, as well as the management of firstarrival and integration programs. The first part of the article analyses the agreements signed with Manitoba, Alberta British Columbia and Ontario and then, in the second part, it analyses the impact of these agreements in both the migratory model and the Canadian federal system. The article concludes that the agreements have reduced, but not eliminated, the level of asymmetry regarding the competences in immigration. Furthermore, the policies taken by the provinces put in focus the need of reviewing the �high-skilled migrants� profile and the need to implement coordination mechanisms in order to avoid distortions to the Canadian migratory model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista "Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad"→Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→