MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165146212 · doi:10.5539/ass.v8n8p55

Study on Employment Flow of Agricultural Graduates in Agricultural and Forestry Universities

2012· article· en· W2165146212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yao Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureDistribution (mathematics)Work (physics)Flow (mathematics)Work flowBusinessAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceForestryPolitical scienceEconomicsGeographyMathematicsEngineeringEnvironmental scienceIndustrial engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the basis of data of employment of graduates in 2008 to 2011 majoring in agriculture, this article made a statistics and analysis of employment flow of agricultural graduates and the causes for the flow of talents, with the aim of providing guidance for pursuit of employment and choosing of an occupation in terms of taking part in the postgraduate entrance exams, industrial distribution and work region, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicTechnology and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207