Strengthening due to interlamellar constraint in oriented syndiotactic styrene–<i>p</i>‐methyl styrene copolymer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Channel die compression has been used to form highly oriented syndiotactic styrene–p‐methylstyrene copolymer in the solid state. The highest forming temperatures were at or near the nominal unoriented melting point (247°C). The oriented materials produced at 245 and 220°C were examined by differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The measured increases in modulus, which resulted from the forming of the copolymer could be related to the microstructural changes in the material. The analysis of mechanical properties with a simple Takayanagi model showed that the high modulus above the glass transition temperature in oriented samples was at least partly due to an interlamellar constraint of the kind suggested by Arridge and co‐workers. The magnitudes of the constraint factor that were estimated in the modeling process were consistent with the observed microstructural changes. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2312–2321, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".