MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of pregnancy‐induced hypertension on birthweight by gestational age

2004· article· en· W2165218997 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Xiong, William D. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSuzhou University
KeywordsMedicineEclampsiaObstetricsGestational ageGestational hypertensionBlood pressureBirth weightConfoundingGestationSmall for gestational agePreeclampsiaPregnancyPopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few studies to date have examined the effect of severe pre-eclampsia, pre-eclampsia, and gestational hypertension on birthweight according to gestational age. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 16,936 pregnant women in Suzhou, China. Analysis of variance and multivariable linear regression were performed to compare the mean birthweights of babies born to mothers with gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and severe pre-eclampsia with birthweights of infants born to mothers with normal blood pressure at each week of gestation. The differences in mean birthweight between women with severe pre-eclampsia and women with normal blood pressure ranged between -467.7 g and 189.1 g. The birthweights were statistically significantly lower in women with severe pre-eclampsia than in women with normal blood pressure for gestational age categories < or = 35 and 36 weeks. However, after adjustment for confounding variables, the birthweights were not statistically significantly different in women with severe pre-eclampsia when compared with women with normal blood pressure even at < or = 35 and 36 weeks. The differences in mean birthweight between women with pre-eclampsia and women with normal blood pressure ranged between -132.2 g and 174.6 g. These differences were not statistically significant, before or after adjusting for confounding variables. There were no differences in mean birthweight between women with gestational hypertension and women with normal blood pressure. Further analysis suggested that pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension were associated with increased rates of both small-for-gestational-age and large-for-gestational-age infants. The majority of the babies born to mothers with different types of pregnancy-induced hypertension were appropriate-for-gestational-age or even large-for-gestational-age. In this Chinese population, most babies born to mothers with severe pre-eclampsia or pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension had similar fetal growth to those born to normotensive mothers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatric and Perinatal EpidemiologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207