MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165224060 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2007.906764

Design and Analysis of Supervised and Decision-Directed Estimators of the MMSE/LCMV Filter in Data Limited Environments

2008· article· en· W2165224060 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey M. Farrell, Ioannis Psaromiligkos, Stella N. Batalama

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorMinimum mean square errorFadingComputer scienceAlgorithmFilter (signal processing)Multipath propagationContext (archaeology)Minimum-variance unbiased estimatorUpper and lower boundsMean squared errorControl theory (sociology)Filter designMathematicsAdaptive filterStatisticsArtificial intelligenceDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider sample-matrix-inversion (SMI)-type estimates of the minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) and the linearly constrained-minimum-variance (LCMV) linear filters obtained from data records of limited size. We quantify theoretically the (detrimental) effect of the desired-signal energy level on the mean square (MS) filter estimation error and the normalized output signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) by deriving a new exact analytical expression and a lower bound, respectively. For cases where accumulation of pure disturbance observations is not possible, we show theoretically how certain intuitive, pilot-assisted, and decision-directed adaptive filter implementations that utilize desired-signal-present data/observations perform close to their desired-signal-absent counterparts. Simulation studies illustrate our theoretical developments in the context of spread-spectrum communications over multipath fading channels under perfect and nonperfect synchronization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207